Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 transformed American higher education by prohibiting sex-based discrimination in federally funded educational programs. While its scope extends beyond athletics to admissions, hiring, and campus safety, its impact on sports has generated the most debate. Title IX is often misunderstood as a law that eliminates men’s teams, when its actual intent is to ensure equitable opportunities for all students. This article explains Title IX’s purpose, addresses common misconceptions, explores the “three-prong test” for compliance, and examines how athletic associations like the NCAA, NAIA, and NJCAA apply the law today.
The Purpose of Title IX
The statutory text of Title IX is concise: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance”.
In practice, this means colleges and universities must:
- Provide equitable access to educational programs.
- Ensure gender equity in athletics participation, funding, and treatment.
- Establish reporting mechanisms for sexual harassment and assault, as sexual misconduct was later defined as a form of discrimination under Title IX.
In athletics, Title IX does not require identical programs for men and women but demands that institutions provide proportional opportunities and equitable support.
Historical Context
Before Title IX, athletic opportunities for women were scarce. In 1971, fewer than 30,000 women competed in intercollegiate athletics, compared to more than 170,000 men. By 2019, over 220,000 women participated in NCAA sports. This dramatic increase illustrates Title IX’s role in expanding access.
Court rulings such as Alexander v. Yale (1980) extended Title IX’s scope by recognizing sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination. Meanwhile, federal enforcement—through the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR)—clarified how schools must balance men’s and women’s athletics.
Common Misconceptions About Title IX
Misconception 1: Title IX eliminates men’s sports
A persistent claim is that men’s teams are “cut” because of Title IX. In reality, the law does not mandate the elimination of men’s sports. Institutions facing budget pressures sometimes reduce men’s teams rather than expand women’s offerings, but this is an administrative choice, not a statutory requirement.
Misconception 2: Title IX requires identical funding for men’s and women’s teams
Title IX requires equity, not identical budgets. For example, football programs naturally incur higher costs due to equipment and roster sizes. Compliance focuses on whether male and female athletes receive equivalent treatment in facilities, coaching, medical services, and recruiting, not whether each team has identical dollar allocations.
Misconception 3: Title IX only applies to athletics
While athletics garners the most attention, Title IX applies to admissions, employment, and campus climate. Every federally funded school must have a Title IX coordinator and grievance process for sexual harassment cases.
The Three-Prong Test for Compliance
OCR introduced the “three-prong test” in 1979 to evaluate athletic compliance:
- Proportionality – Athletic participation opportunities must be proportionate to enrollment. For example, if 55% of undergraduates are women, roughly 55% of athletic opportunities should be available to women.
- History of Expansion – If not proportional, an institution can show a history and continuing practice of expanding opportunities for the underrepresented sex.
- Full Accommodation – Schools may demonstrate that they are meeting the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex, even if participation is not proportional.
Institutions need to meet only one of the three prongs to comply.
Title IX Across Athletic Associations
NCAA (Divisions I, II, III)
The NCAA Constitution affirms gender equity as a core principle. While enforcement of Title IX comes from federal agencies, NCAA bylaws reflect its spirit by requiring:
- Fair treatment of male and female athletes in practice schedules, facilities, and scholarships.
- Provisions for institutional control and diversity, equity, and inclusion.
- Governance structures (e.g., Senior Woman Administrator positions) to safeguard representation.
NAIA
The NAIA emphasizes institutional flexibility but still requires equity in scholarship distribution and program administration. While smaller than the NCAA, NAIA schools are subject to the same federal Title IX mandates.
NJCAA
The NJCAA explicitly endorses gender equity as part of its philosophy. Its handbook states that equitable opportunities must be provided in both the “quantity and quality” of participation, benefits, and resources. Given the community college mission, Title IX plays a crucial role in ensuring women’s access to athletic opportunities at two-year institutions.
Measuring Equity in Practice
Compliance is not just about roster numbers but also about the quality of experience. The OCR reviews factors including:
- Facilities (stadiums, locker rooms, practice fields)
- Coaching quality and compensation
- Access to medical services and training staff
- Travel accommodations and per diem allowances
- Publicity and media coverage
A program may meet participation proportionality but still fall short if female athletes consistently receive inferior resources.
Enforcement and Challenges
Title IX is enforced through OCR investigations, often triggered by complaints. High-profile cases have forced universities to revise budgets, add women’s teams, or improve resources.
Challenges include:
- Football’s outsized role: Large rosters make proportionality harder.
- Budget constraints: Smaller schools may argue financial hardship in balancing programs.
- Legal debates: Lawsuits continue to refine interpretations, particularly regarding transgender athletes and evolving definitions of sex discrimination.
Title IX Moving Forward
Fifty years after its passage, Title IX remains both celebrated and contested. Future issues include:
- Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL): Ensuring female athletes benefit equally from new commercial opportunities.
- Transgender participation: Balancing fairness, inclusion, and competitive equity.
- Continued expansion: Emerging sports like women’s wrestling, triathlon, and rugby are being added at NCAA institutions, often as a way to enhance compliance.
Title IX is not a zero-sum law that pits men’s and women’s sports against each other. It is a civil rights statute ensuring fairness in educational opportunities, including athletics. While compliance remains complex, its spirit is straightforward: equal opportunity, equitable treatment, and protection from discrimination.
From the NCAA to the NJCAA, every governing body affirms gender equity as foundational. The continued challenge is not whether Title IX applies, but how institutions interpret and implement its requirements within financial and cultural realities. As athletics evolve, Title IX remains a living framework shaping opportunities for future generations of student-athletes.
BYU-I Sports 
Leave a comment